Split does not "split" potential

Antworten
Hougaarden
Beiträge: 42
Registriert: Mittwoch 19. September 2018, 10:10

Split does not "split" potential

Beitrag von Hougaarden » Donnerstag 18. Februar 2021, 11:00

I just noticed that using split has no effect on the potential of a copper-strip.
Making the standard split a bit wider on one side does the trick.
To split or not to split.jpg
To split or not to split.jpg (78.99 KiB) 1975 mal betrachtet
Regards, Wilfried Vermeire

abacom
Site Admin
Beiträge: 3917
Registriert: Dienstag 23. September 2008, 10:54
Kontaktdaten:

Re: Split does not "split" potential

Beitrag von abacom » Donnerstag 25. Februar 2021, 10:24

Well, I see the behavior in your picture, but I wasn´t able to reproduce this myself in a project.
There might be an accidental connection of "gray" somewhere (outside of the picture), perhaps?
Any advice how to reproduce this effect? Please attach or send file.

It looks like, that there were copper eyes hidden beyond the tracks? These might cause the effect, perhaps.
In that case remove the redundant copper eyes, please. Use copper track and drilling elements only, for this kind of layout.
Do not combine tracks with redundant copper eyes, but use drillings instead.
ABACOM support

Hougaarden
Beiträge: 42
Registriert: Mittwoch 19. September 2018, 10:10

Re: Split does not "split" potential

Beitrag von Hougaarden » Montag 1. März 2021, 09:00

I 'm sorry, it was my mistake. :oops:
The board I designed consisted of tracks and pads. I redesigned it with only pads at the ends and tracks with holes between them.
Everything is OK now. Even the smallest split will split the potentials now.

Regards, Wilfried Vermeire.

abacom
Site Admin
Beiträge: 3917
Registriert: Dienstag 23. September 2008, 10:54
Kontaktdaten:

Re: Split does not "split" potential

Beitrag von abacom » Montag 1. März 2021, 14:18

Thanks for response. Happy to hear that.
ABACOM support

Antworten

Zurück zu „Einsteigerfragen / FAQ“